翻訳と辞書 Words near each other ・ Hillman Imp ・ Hillman Library ・ Hillman Minx ・ Hillman Periodicals ・ Hillman Robbins ・ Hillman Site ・ Hillman State Park ・ Hillman Super Minx ・ Hillman Terome Frazier ・ Hillman Township ・ Hillman Township, Kanabec County, Minnesota ・ Hillman Township, Michigan ・ Hillman Township, Minnesota ・ Hillman Township, Morrison County, Minnesota ・ Hillman Twenty-70 & 16 h.p. ・ Hillman v. Maretta ・ Hillman Wizard ・ Hillman's Airways ・ Hillman, Michigan ・ Hillman, Minnesota ・ Hillman, Montana ・ Hillman, Western Australia ・ Hillman-Circle Sport LLC ・ Hillmar ・ Hillmont (Lake Toxaway, North Carolina) ・ Hillmorton ・ Hilloawmahad ・ Hillock ・ Hillol Kargupta ・ Hillous Butrum Dictionary Lists mini英和辞書 mini和英辞書 Webster 1913 Latin-English FOLDOC Wikipedia English ウィキペディア

翻訳と辞書　辞書検索 [ 開発暫定版 ] スポンサード リンク Hillman v. Maretta ： ウィキペディア英語版 Hillman v. Maretta ''Hilmann v. Maretta'' was a 2013 United States Supreme Court decision in which the court unanimously ruled that a Virginia statute revoking beneficiary status for spouses whose marital status has changed was pre-empted by the Federal Employees’ Group Life Insurance Act (1954). ==Details== Warren Hillman was a retired employee of the General Services Administration under the Federal Government of the United States. He married Judy Maretta in 1989, but they divorced in 1998. However, Hillman had designated Maretta as his federal life insurance policy beneficiary in 1996. Warren Hillman later married Jacqueline or Jackie in 2002, but died of leukemia at the age of 66 in 2008. In his will, he had "left everything" to his wife Jackie. After Warren Hillman's death, Maretta claimed the life insurance policy and was paid $124,558.03. Jackie Hillman sued Maretta to recover the benefits under the Commonwealth of Virginia statute that revoked a divorced spouse's beneficiary in favor of a widow or widower. The Fairfax County Circuit Court decided the case in Hillman's favor, awarding her the FEGLI benefits. However, the decision was overturned by the Virginia Supreme Court, which ruled that federal insurance programs preempt state laws, citing previous U. S. Supreme Court decisions ''Wissner v. Wissner'' and ''Ridgeway v. Ridgeway''.〔 Jackie Hillman then appealed to the Supreme Court, which heard the arguments on April 22, 2013, and decided on June 3. Associate Justice Sotomayor in the majority ruling affirmed the Virginia Supreme Court decision, arguing that the order of precedence set by FEGLI sought to honor a federal employee's choice of beneficiary.〔 抄文引用元・出典: フリー百科事典『 ウィキペディア（Wikipedia）』 ■ウィキペディアで「Hillman v. Maretta」の詳細全文を読む スポンサード リンク 翻訳と辞書 : 翻訳のためのインターネットリソース Copyright(C) kotoba.ne.jp 1997-2016. All Rights Reserved.